Brisbane Dead Letter Office datestamp type 7 (from Campbell)
Brisbane Dead Letter Office datestamp type 7 rated 5R. Dated 7 June 1911. Seen in the Queensland Stamp Collecting Facebook Group. It may or may not be slightly different. Hard to tell
-----------------------------------------------------------
BRISBANE DEAD LETTER OFFICE
By H. M. CAMPBELL, R.D.P., F.R.P.S.L..
When I wrote the article on the Brisbane Dead Letter Office
which appeared in the March issue, I had hoped that it would be up to date at
least for a little while. It was not to be, however, as even before the article
appeared, I had bought a cover at one of Gary Watson's auctions which shows a
previously unrecorded Dead Letter Office mark. The cover was sent from
Edinburgh, Scotland to the G.P.O., Brisbane, was sent on to Dunwich, then to
Gympie, and again back to the G.P.O.; at one point the letter had been opened
by a gentleman of the same name as the addressee, who noted
that it was not for him, and the cover was secured again
with two "Found Open and Officially Sealed" labels. On the reverse is
an oval mark, 39 x 26mm, with an inner oval 30%½ x 17mm, and between the ovals
'DEAD LETTER OFFICE' round the top, 'BRISBANE' at the foot, and stops at each
side; in the centre is the date in one line, with the month in three letters
and the year in full (-3 MAR. 1904). It is struck in blue. As the date is
within the known usage period for my Type 4, and no other examples of the new
mark are known, I would say that this implement was normally used for other
duties in the Dead Letter Office, and for some reason, perhaps some emergency,
was used for stamping this cover instead of Type 4. Let us call it Type 6.
There are one or two things in the article which need correcting. On page 7,
the last word in the third-last line should read 'later', not 'letter'.
Something went wrong with the captions for the illustrations at the bottom of
page 8: 'Type 2' should be Type 1', 'Type I' should be 'Type 3', and 'Type 3'
should be 'Type 2'.
In the first paragraph on page 9, I give the impression that Brisbane's 'NOT KNOWN BY/LETTER CARRIERS' was superseded by the oval UNCLAIMED/BRISBANE'. This, however, is misleading, as the former remained in contemporaneous use. I have an 1899 postcard from England with both, and a 1909 postcard from New Zealand with the 'NOT KNOWN... marking.
No comments:
Post a Comment